Submission details
| Submission ID | 8928 |
|---|---|
| Name | Len Halgryn |
| Date | 19 March 2026 |
| Do you support Council’s proposal to make minor amendments to the Trading in Public Places Bylaw? |
I partially support option 1
|
| Please tell us the reasons for your response. |
Specifically I would prefer footpath signage not to be placed where it obstructs a desire line (direct route) for a footpath user going from A to B. That is not addressed adequately.
And: outdoor trading (which includes dining) should not occupy footpath areas under canopies, i.e. footpath users going from A to B should have priority use of at least 1.7 or 2.0 metres (as the case may be) of shelter, not traders. That too is not addressed. |
| Do you support Council’s proposal to make minor amendments to the Trading in Public Places Policy? |
I partially support option 1
|
| Please tell us the reasons for your response. |
Please see response to Question 1, to which policy should be adapted.
|
| Are you giving feedback on behalf of an organisation? |
No, these are my own personal views
|