Submission details
| Submission ID | 9780 |
|---|---|
| Name | Alan Tsai |
| Date | 2 April 2026 |
| 2a. Do you support a growth pays for growth approach for new residential and commercial developments, including the use of growth charges to help fund growth-related infrastructure and services? |
Yes
|
| Please provide comment. |
priority stage is focus on within Hamilton city areas but not for the more and more fast track projects of the wider Waikato areas recently. Because the IAWAI funding is limited but more resources are come from Hamilton city council. That should be a fair proportion ratio for both parties council and listing the most needed projects to the public and explain the reasons why.
|
| 2b. In the current residential growth charges proposal secondary minor dwellings (i.e. granny flats) may be treated as ½ HUE. Do you support treating secondary minor dwellings as ½ HUE? If you have an alternative proposal, please explain. |
Yes,
|
| 3. How would you prefer IAWAI engage you? |
Website, Social media, Letter / Flyer, E-newsletter, Focus groups
|
| 4. Do you support IAWAI’s Significance and Engagement Policy? |
Yes
|
| 5. Do you have any feedback on the Significance and Engagement Policy? |
New buyer pay the growth infrastructure fee, $500 per year for 25 years. That's too low ,should be increased $300 per year. Every year pay $800 for the new buyer is reasonable and acceptable. That would be balanced and acceptable for the council ,developer,buyer and pushing city growth reasonably.
|
| 6. Do you support IAWAI'S Waiver Policy? |
Partially support
|
| Are you giving feedback on behalf of an organisation? |
No, these are my own personal views
|